By: Dan Simmons
I mean, damn. Not since Dune has a series expanded in a way that blew my mind quite like this. In Books One and Two you get that time is going to get a little wonky but damn. Shit gets cray.
In Books One and Two you get some really awesome character building. In Book Three you get that and amazing world-building. This feels more like the middle book of the series. What I mean by that is, it is 100% an alley-oop to Book Four. Additionally, there are call backs and important plot-points you need to have read the first two installments to fully appreciate Endymion.
In Endymion you get a sense of what’s to come. Meaning, when you’re done with this book you know you are about to get the philosophical hammer. From the get-go Simmons has been preparing you for that fact but by Book Three its imminent.
At this point, the only series this compares to is Dune. Yes. That is correct. I did just draw a comparison between this series and my all-time heavy-hitting favorite. Aside from Herbert I can think of no other author that so seamlessly, thoroughly and masterfully interweaves science fiction with philosophy and poetry.
:: un-ironic slow clap::